• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Appl. Phys. 99, 124905 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2203720 (19 pages)

A photoemission model for low work function coated metal surfaces and its experimental validation

Kevin L. Jensen1, Donald W. Feldman2, Nathan A. Moody2, and Patrick G. O’Shea2

1Code 6843, ESTD, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5347
2IREAP, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742-3511

View MapView Map

(Received 12 September 2005; accepted 14 April 2006; published online 21 June 2006)

Photocathodes are a critical component many linear accelerator based light sources. The development of a custom-engineered photocathode based on low work function coatings requires an experimentally validated photoemission model that accounts the complexity of the emission process. We have developed a time-dependent model accounting for the effects of laser heating and thermal propagation on photoemission. It accounts for surface conditions (coating, field enhancement, and reflectivity), laser parameters (duration, intensity, and wavelength), and material characteristics (reflectivity, laser penetration depth, and scattering rates) to predict current distribution and quantum efficiency (QE) as a function of wavelength. The model is validated by (i) experimental measurements of the QE of cesiated surfaces, (ii) the QE and performance of commercial dispenser cathodes (B, M, and scandate), and (iii) comparison to QE values reported in the literature for bare metals and B-type dispenser cathodes, all for various wavelengths. Of particular note is that the highest QE for a commercial (M-type) dispenser cathode found here was measured to be 0.22% at 266 nm, and is projected to be 3.5 times larger for a 5 ps pulse delivering 0.6 mJ/cm2 under a 50 MV/m field.

© 2006 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EMITTED CURRENT AND QUANTUM EFFICIENCY
    1. The modified Fowler-Dubridge photocurrent model
    2. Thermal emission current
    3. The evaluation of quantum efficiency
  3. TIME-DEPENDENT ELECTRON AND LATTICE TEMPERATURE EVALUATION
    1. The heat diffusion equations
    2. Absorbed laser power
    3. Electron and lattice specific heat
    4. Scattering rates and thermal conductivity
    5. Numerical solution of thermal equations
    6. Quantum efficiency and bare metals
    7. Macro-time-scales and multiple pulses
  4. WORK FUNCTION VARIATION AND SURFACE COVERAGE EFFECTS
    1. Macroscopic versus microscopic variation: The patch model
    2. Modified Gyftopolous-Levine model
    3. Comparison of modified GL to experiment of cesium-coated tungsten
    4. Experimental setup to measure QE of Cs on W
    5. Comparison of modified GL theory to experimental data
  5. DISPENSER CATHODES
    1. Field and intensity variation
    2. The quantum efficiency of dispenser cathodes
  6. CONCLUSION

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 79.60.Bm

    Clean metal, semiconductor, and insulator surfaces

  • 85.60.Ha

    Photomultipliers; phototubes and photocathodes

  • 73.30.+y

    Surface double layers, Schottky barriers, and work functions

  • 81.65.-b

    Surface treatments

  • 42.62.-b

    Laser applications

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:

0021-8979 (print)  
1089-7550 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    T. Srinivasan-Rao, J. Schill, I. Ben Zvi, and M. Woodle, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 2292 (1998)RSINAK000069000006002292000001.

    P. G. O'Shea, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1081 (1998).

    K. L. Jensen, D. W. Feldman, M. Virgo, and P. G. O'Shea, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 083501 (2003).

    T. Srinivasan-Rao, J. Fischer, and T. Tsang, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 1275 (1995)JAPIAU000077000003001275000001.

    W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. 112, 114 (1958).

    T. Maruyama, R. Prepost, E. L. Garwin, C. K. Sinclair, and B. Dunham, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1686 (1989)APPLAB000055000016001686000001.

    J. Lewellen, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5, 020101 (2002).

    R. T. Longo, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6966 (2003)JAPIAU000094000010006966000001.

    K. L. Jensen, D. W. Feldman, and P. G. O'Shea, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5448 (2004)APPLAB000085000022005448000001.

    R. H. Fowler, Phys. Rev. 38, 45 (1931).

    L. A. DuBridge, Phys. Rev. 43, 727 (1933).

    K. L. Jensen, P. G. O'Shea, and D. W. Feldman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3867 (2002)APPLAB000081000020003867000001.

    E. M. Logothetis and P. L. Hartman, Phys. Rev. 187, 460 (1969).

    J. H. Bechtel, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1585 (1975)JAPIAU000046000004001585000001.

    X. Y. Wang, D. M. Riffe, Y.-S. Lee, and M. C. Downer, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8016 (1994).

    T. Srinivasan-Rao, J. Fischer, and T. Tsang, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 3291 (1990)JAPIAU000069000005003291000001.

    E. P. Gyftopolous and J. D. Levine, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 67 (1962)JAPIAU000033000001000067000001.

    J. B. Taylor and I. Langmuir, Phys. Rev. 44, 423 (1933).

    C.-S. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 1477 (1977)JAPIAU000048000004001477000001.

    K. L. Jensen, D. W. Feldman, and P. G. O'Shea, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5448 (2004)APPLAB000085000022005448000001.

    K. L. Jensen, P. G. O'Shea, and D. W. Feldman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3867 (2002)APPLAB000081000020003867000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (25) Tables (3)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close