Jump to Content
Your Recent History
View Cart
LOG IN or SELECT A PURCHASE OPTION:
J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5741 (1998); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.367430 (9 pages)
Experimental characterization of quasi static and shock wave behavior of porous aluminum
(Received 9 September 1996; accepted 21 January 1998)
Alerts
Alert Me When Cited
Alert Me When Corrected
Tools
Download Citation
Add to MyScitation
Permissions / Reprints
Blog This Article
Print-Friendly
Research Toolkit
Share
Email Abstract
Connotea
CiteULike
del.icio.us
BibSonomy
Tweet this Article
Add to FacebookExperiments of quasi static hydrostatic and uniaxial strain compression, and of shock wave propagation performed on 9% and 17% porous aluminum are presented, analyzed, and compared. Quasi static experiments show the influence of coupling between void collapse and plasticity induced in the matrix on the material macroscopic behavior. The amount of pore compaction appears to be enhanced by the deviatoric stress component present in the uniaxial strain tests and not in the hydrostatic ones. The originality of the plate impact setup and its associated metrology [velocity interferometer system for any reflector (VISAR) interferometry and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric gages] exhibits also the influence of these local physical mechanisms on shock wave propagation in porous aluminum. More, the variations observed between the rise times of shocks seem to point out a preponderance of the dynamic effects (inertia or strain rate) over the material behavior. We observe indeed that the higher the stress in the material, the shorter the shock rise time. This point is confirmed by comparing quasi static and dynamic responses of porous aluminum. Comparison of these experimental results to numerical simulations should be interesting to prove or not this hypothesis. © 1998 American Institute of Physics.
© 1998 American Institute of Physics
RELATED DATABASES
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
KEYWORDS and PACS
ARTICLE DATA
Digital Object Identifier
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
-
F. Lu, S. Huan, and J. Ding, AIP Conf. Proc. 309, 1013 (1993).
R. R. Boade, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5693 (1968)JAPIAU000039000012005693000001.
R. R. Boade, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 3781 (1969)JAPIAU000040000009003781000001.
K.-H. Oh and P.-A. Persson, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3852 (1989)JAPIAU000065000010003852000001.
B. M. Butcher, M. M. Carroll, and A. C. Holt, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3864 (1974)JAPIAU000045000009003864000001.
R. N. Shock, A. E. Abey, and A. Duba, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 53 (1976)JAPIAU000047000001000053000001.
D. J. Griffiths, D. J. Buettner, and P. Tsou, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 4790 (1991)JAPIAU000070000009004790000001.
J. W. Swegle, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2574 (1980)JAPIAU000051000005002574000001.
L. Seaman, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 4303 (1974)JAPIAU000045000010004303000001.
W. Tong and G. Ravichandran, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 2425 (1993)JAPIAU000074000004002425000001.
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
This Publication
Scitation
SPIN
Google Scholar
PubMed