• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter iResearch App Facebook

J. Appl. Phys. 109, 084305 (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3567912 (11 pages)

Critical tensile and compressive strains for cracking of Al2O3 films grown by atomic layer deposition

Shih-Hui Jen1, Jacob A. Bertrand1, and Steven M. George1,2

1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
2Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 16 October 2010; accepted 22 February 2011; published online 18 April 2011)

Al2O3 atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a model ALD system and Al2O3 ALD films are excellent gas diffusion barrier on polymers. However, little is known about the response of Al2O3 ALD films to strain and the potential film cracking that would restrict the utility of gas diffusion barrier films. To understand the mechanical limitations of Al2O3 ALD films, the critical strains at which the Al2O3 ALD films will crack were determined for both tensile and compressive strains. The tensile strain measurements were obtained using a fluorescent tagging technique to image the cracks. The results showed that the critical tensile strain is higher for thinner thicknesses of the Al2O3 ALD film on heat-stabilized polyethylene naphthalate (HSPEN) substrates. A low critical tensile strain of 0.52% was measured for a film thickness of 80 nm. The critical tensile strain increased to 2.4% at a film thickness of 5 nm. In accordance with fracture mechanics modeling, the critical tensile strains and the saturation crack densities scaled as (1/h)1/2 where h is the Al2O3 ALD film thickness. The fracture toughness for cracking, KIC, of the Al2O3 ALD film was also determined to be KIC = 2.30 MPa m1/2. Thinner Al2O3 ALD film thicknesses also had higher critical strains for cracking from compressive strains. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images revealed that Al2O3 ALD films with thicknesses of 30–50 nm on Teflon fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) substrates cracked at a critical compressive strain of ∼1.0%. The critical compressive strain increased to ∼2.0% at a film thickness of ∼20 nm. A comparison of the critical tensile strains on HSPEN substrates and critical compressive strains on Teflon FEP substrates revealed some similarities. The critical strain was ∼1.0% for film thicknesses of 30–50 nm for both tensile and compressive strains. The critical compressive strain then increased more rapidly than the critical tensile strain for thinner films with thicknesses < 30 nm. The high critical tensile and compressive strains for thin Al2O3 ALD films should be very useful for flexible gas diffusion barriers on polymers.

© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENTAL
    1. Al 2 O 3 ALD film growth
    2. Tensile strain measurements
    3. Compressive stress measurements
  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    1. Tensile strain for cracking
    2. Compressive strain for cracking
    3. Comparison between critical tensile and compressive strains for cracking
  4. CONCLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 68.60.Bs

    Mechanical and acoustical properties

  • 81.40.Np

    Fatigue, corrosion fatigue, embrittlement, cracking, fracture, and failure

  • 62.20.mt

    Cracks

  • 81.40.Lm

    Deformation, plasticity, and creep

  • 68.55.A-

    Nucleation and growth

  • 68.55.jd

    Thickness

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-8979 (print)  
1089-7550 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

    References

    D. C. Miller, R. R. Foster, Y. D. Zhang, S. H. Jen, J. A. Bertrand, Z. X. Lu, D. Seghete, J. L. O'Patchen, R. G. Yang, Y. C. Lee, S. M. George, and M. L. Dunn, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 093527 (2009)JAPIAU000105000009093527000001.

    P. F. Carcia, R. S. McLean, M. D. Groner, A. A. Dameron, and S. M. George, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 023533 (2009)JAPIAU000106000002023533000001.

    P. F. Carcia, R. S. McLean, M. H. Reilly, M. D. Groner, and S. M. George, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 031915 (2006)APPLAB000089000003031915000001.

    M. D. Groner, S. M. George, R. S. McLean, and P. F. Carcia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 051907 (2006)APPLAB000088000005051907000001.

    E. Langereis, M. Creatore, S. B. S. Heil, M. C. M. Van de Sanden, and W. M. M. Kessels, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 081915 (2006)APPLAB000089000008081915000001.

    A. P. Ghosh, L. J. Gerenser, C. M. Jarman, and J. E. Fornalik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 223503 (2005)APPLAB000086000022223503000001.

    N. Kim, W. J. Potscavage, B. Domercq, B. Kippelen, and S. Graham, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 163308 (2009)APPLAB000094000016163308000001.

    J. Meyer, D. Schneidenbach, T. Winkler, S. Hamwi, T. Weimann, P. Hinze, S. Ammermann, H. H. Johannes, T. Riedl, and W. Kowalsky, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 233305 (2009)APPLAB000094000023233305000001.

    W. J. Potscavage, S. Yoo, B. Domercq, and B. Kippelen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 253511 (2007APPLAB000090000025253511000001).

    J. W. Elam, M. D. Groner, and S. M. George, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73, 2981 (2002)RSINAK000073000008002981000001.

    Z. Suo, E. Y. Ma, H. Gleskova, and S. Wagner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1177 (1999)APPLAB000074000008001177000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (13) Tables (2)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close