• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 073304 (2009); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3236508 (9 pages)

Influence of gas pressure and applied voltage on Xe excimer radiation from a micro dielectric barrier discharge for plasma display panel

Giichiro Uchida1, Satoshi Uchida2, Hiroshi Kajiyama1, and Tsutae Shinoda1

1Graduate School of Advanced Science of Matter, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan
2Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji 192-0397, Japan

View MapView Map

(Received 21 July 2009; accepted 21 August 2009; published online 8 October 2009)

We present the influence of gas pressure and applied voltage on Xe excimer radiation from a microdielectric barrier discharge (micro-DBD) in Ne/Xe gas mixture for plasma display panel. Measurements show that the excimer radiation with the 172 nm band lines is strongly observed in the afterglow, and drastically increases with an increase in gas pressure and applied voltage. It is also found that for high gas pressure and low voltage, excimer molecule (Xe2) is efficiently produced because of less infrared emission from Xe excited atom. The reaction processes of Xe metastable atom (Xe1s5), which is a precursor for Xe2, are theoretically analyzed using a one-dimensional fluid model. Increasing gas pressure results in large excimer radiation due to the enhancement of the following three processes, i.e., the conversion process from Xe1s5 to Xe2, the direct electron impact excitation from ground state to Xe1s5, and the collisional de-excitation process from upper level (Xe∗∗) to Xe1s5. The simulation analytical result shows that for lower voltage, Xe1s5 is efficiently produced due to the increase in the ratio of direct excitation to Xe1s5 from ground state and the suppression of the stepwise ionization from Xe1s5 by electron collisions. While for high voltage operation of micro-DBD, the recombination process with Xe molecular ion (Xe2+) and electron contributes to the total excimer radiation, which can be responsible for the large excimer radiation observed in experiment.

© 2009 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. EXPERIMENTS
  3. SIMULATION ANALYSIS
    1. Conversion process from Xe metastable atom to excimer molecule
    2. Production process of Xe metastable atom
    3. Loss process of Xe metastable atom
    4. Recombination process with Xe2+ and electron
  4. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-8979 (print)  
1089-7550 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    G. Oversluizen, M. Klein, S. de Zwart, S. van Heusden, and T. Dekker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 948 (2000)APPLAB000077000007000948000001.

    G. Oversluizen, M. Klein, S. de Zwart, S. van Heusden, and T. Dekker, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 2403 (2002)JAPIAU000091000004002403000001.

    M. F. Gillies and G. Oversluizen, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 6315 (2002)JAPIAU000091000010006315000001.

    G. Oversluizen, K. Itoh, T. Shiga, and S. Mikoshiba, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033303 (2008)JAPIAU000104000003033303000001.

    H. S. Bae, J. K. Kim, H. Y. Jung, J. K. Lim, and K. W. Whang, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 123308 (2007)JAPIAU000102000012123308000001.

    H. S. Jeong, J. H. Seo, C. K. Yoon, J. K. Kim, and K. W. Whang, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3092 (1999)JAPIAU000085000006003092000001.

    J. H. Seo, H. S. Jeong, J. Y. Lee, C. K. Yoon, J. K. Kim, and K. W. Whang, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 1257 (2000)JAPIAU000088000003001257000001.

    E. H. Choi, J. C. Ahn, M. W. Moon, Y. Jung, M. C. Choi, Y. Seo, G. Cho, H. S. Uhm, K. Tachibana, K. W. Whang, and M. Kristiansen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3341 (2002)APPLAB000081000018003341000001.

    M. Ohwa, T. J. Moratz, and M. J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 5131 (1989)JAPIAU000066000011005131000001.

    P. K. Leichner, K. F. Palmer, J. D. Cook, and M. Thieneman, Phys. Rev. A 13, 1787 (1976).

    T. D. Bonifield, F. H. K. Rambow, G. K. Walters, M. J. McCusker, D. C. Lorents, and R. A. Gutcheck, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2914 (1980)JCPSA6000072000005002914000001.

    K. Tachibana, N. Kosugi, and T. Sakai, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 935 (1994)APPLAB000065000008000935000001.

    K. Tachibana, S. Feng, and T. Sakai, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 4967 (2000)JAPIAU000088000009004967000001.

    J. Meunier, P. Belenguer, and J. P. Boeuf, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 731 (1995)JAPIAU000078000002000731000001.

    G. J. Hagelaar, M. H. Klein, R. M. M. Snijkers, and G. M. W. Kroesen, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 2033 (2001)JAPIAU000089000004002033000001.

    D. Hayashi, G. Heusler, G. Hagelaar, and G. Kroesen, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1656 (2004)JAPIAU000095000004001656000001.

    Y. Noguchi, A. Matsuoka, K. Uchino, and K. Muraoka, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 613 (2002)JAPIAU000091000002000613000001.

    K. Suzuki, Y. Kawanami, S. Ho, N. Uemura, Y. Yajima, N. Kouchi, and Y. Hatano, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 5605 (2000)JAPIAU000088000010005605000001.

    S. Mikoshiba and S. Murayama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 529 (1980)APPLAB000037000006000529000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (19)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close