• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

J. Appl. Phys. 107, 09E116 (2010); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3364062 (5 pages)

Diffraction line-shapes, Fermi surface nesting, and quantum criticality in antiferromagnetic chromium at high pressure (invited)

R. Jaramillo1, Yejun Feng2,3, and T. F. Rosenbaum3

1School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
2The Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
3The James Franck Institute and Department of Physics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 27 October 2009; accepted 4 December 2009; published online 27 April 2010)

We explore the behavior of the nested bandstructure of chromium as a function of temperature and pressure to the point where magnetism disappears. X-ray diffraction measurements of the charge order parameter suggest that the nesting condition is maintained at high pressure, where the spin density wave ground state is destabilized by a continuous quantum phase transition. By comparing diffraction line-shapes measured throughout the temperature-pressure phase diagram we are able to identify and describe three regimes: thermal near-critical, weak coupling ground state, and quantum critical.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 75.50.Ee

    Antiferromagnetics

  • 75.30.Ds

    Spin waves

  • 62.50.-p

    High-pressure effects in solids and liquids

  • 71.18.+y

    Fermi surface: calculations and measurements; effective mass, g factor

  • 75.30.Kz

    Magnetic phase boundaries (including classical and quantum magnetic transitions, metamagnetism, etc.)

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0021-8979 (print)  
1089-7550 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    P. A. Fedders and P. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. 143, 245 (1966).

    D. G. Laurent, J. Callaway, J. L. Fry, and N. E. Brener, Phys. Rev. B 23, 4977 (1981).

    T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 2, 3619 (1970).

    C. Pépin and M. R. Norman, Phys. Rev. B 69, 060402 (2004).

    R. Jaramillo, Y. Feng, J. C. Lang, Z. Islam, G. Srajer, H. M. Rønnow, P. B. Littlewood, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184418 (2008).

    Y. Feng, R. Jaramillo, G. Srajer, J. C. Lang, Z. Islam, M. S. Somayazulu, O. G. Shpyrko, J. J. Pluth, H. K. Mao, E. D. Isaacs, G. Aeppli, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 137201 (2007).

    J. P. Hill, G. Helgesen, and D. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10336 (1995).

    D. W. Ruesink, J. M. Perz, and I. M. Templeton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 734 (1980).

    H. Hiraka, P. Böni, K. Yamada, S. Park, S. H. Lee, and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. B 70, 144413 (2004).

    A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 128, 1437 (1962).

    P. C. Pattnaik, P. H. Dickinson, and J. L. Fry, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5281 (1983).

    E. Fawcett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 209 (1988).

    R. Ravlić, M. Bode, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Phys. Rev. B 67, 174411 (2003).


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (5)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close